JW_,
I’ve read parts of what you wrote as I usually do when I find something that is very BIAS. I don't spend much time on such poorly written stuff.
Lets face it if something has written in a very prejudicial manner, and not what you consider a fair treatment of facts but very slanted, and the format is in a black and white thinking such as:(I'm right and everybody that disagrees with me is an idiot). Why read it extensively.
Here are a few quotes that are proof of your DOGMATIC style conclusions:
The Proof
The assertion that Jesus Christ is a myth can be proved not only through the works of dissenters and "pagans" who knew the truth - and who were viciously refuted or murdered for their battle against the Christian priests and "Church Fathers" fooling the masses with their fictions - but also through the very statements of the Christians themselves, who continuously disclose that they knew Jesus Christ was a myth founded upon more ancient deities located throughout the known ancient world. In fact, Pope Leo X, privy to the truth because of his high rank, made this curious declaration, "What profit has not that fable of Christ brought us!"15 (Emphasis added.) As Wheless says, "The proofs of my indictment are marvellously easy."Non-Biblical Sources
Basically, there are no non-biblical references to a historical Jesus by any known historian of the time during and after Jesus's purported advent. Walker says, "No literate person of his own time mentioned him in any known writing." Eminent Hellenistic Jewish historian and philosopher Philo (20 B.C.E.-50 C.E.), alive at the purported time of Jesus, makes no mention of him. Nor do any of the some 40 other historians who wrote during the first one to two centuries of the Common Era. "Enough of the writings of [these] authors . . . remain to form a library. Yet in this mass of Jewish and Pagan literature, aside from two forged passages in the works of a Jewish author, and two disputed passages in the works of Roman writers, there is to be found no mention of Jesus Christ."28 Their silence is deafening testimony against the historicizersIn the entire works of the Jewish historian Josephus, which constitute many volumes, there are only two paragraphs that purport to refer to Jesus. Although much has been made of these "references," they have been dismissed by all scholars and even by Christian apologists as forgeries, as have been those referring to John the Baptist and James, "brother" of Jesus. Bishop Warburton labeled the Josephus interpolation regarding Jesus as "a rank forgery, and a very stupid one,
And as I mention If you can’t dazzle them with briliance then you poor on the BULL SHIT as you do here:
Just trying to help you people deprogram from your mind control. If you still believe in JW/Christianity afterwards you are truely an idiot!... Of course there's always the fools in society who take everything literally. I could probably convince you people into thinking Little Red Ridding hood is a true story lol!!!Looking forward to you enlightening posts.
If someone lived a trillion X longer than you, and had a billion X more reasoning ability would he come to the same conclusions as you?